Skip to content
DancingMind

Clinical evidence

Evidence first, claims second

The peer-reviewed publications and trial results behind the platform. Every outcome we cite is matched to a study here, and every entry has been through clinical and governance review.

35%

Faster motor recovery

Versus standard care, in a randomised controlled trial with National Healthcare Group partner hospitals, Singapore, 2024.

2–3×

Improvement in group sessions

Versus one-on-one therapy (active control), in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

22%

Improvement in attention span

In children with ADHD.

Results from specific studies in specific populations. See each study below for full context.

Honest about what's proven

Efficacy is demonstrated. Mechanisms are under study.

Randomised controlled trials with partner hospitals show our programmes outperform standard care and active controls. What the trials don't yet explain is the neural mechanism: why immersive, graded therapy drives the outcomes it does. That question is under active study: it is exactly what our BCI research programme, in prototype with research partners, exists to answer.

Our research frontier → How we make claims →

Reading this library

Peer-reviewed publication
Published in a journal and independently reviewed, cited with venue and DOI where available.
Study summary
Trial results we share in outline form. Clinical teams can request the full protocol, population and endpoints.

The library

Publications & study summaries

Clinical team? Ask for the full picture.

We share protocols, populations and endpoints for our trials with clinical and research teams on request.

Request study details